|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Les,
I’m sure Uniden will make things right for you. On the rare occasion that I have needed their support it’s always been good.
(What about HRO’s return policy do you find unlawful or
Les,
I’m sure Uniden will make things right for you. On the rare occasion that I have needed their support it’s always been good.
(What about HRO’s return policy do you find unlawful or
|
By
Bernard Skoch
·
#1564
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
HRO would not replace (15 day return policy), so I shipped it to Uniden under mfr. warranty. As a 50+ year commercial law attorney I might have questioned HRO's return policy, but it wasn't worth
HRO would not replace (15 day return policy), so I shipped it to Uniden under mfr. warranty. As a 50+ year commercial law attorney I might have questioned HRO's return policy, but it wasn't worth
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1563
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I wuuld agree that you may have a lemon. I have 4 BCT15X’s and 2 BCT15’s plus aa couple of 996xt’s, 2 SDS200’s and seveeral others and find them to be great scanners, but there is always that
I wuuld agree that you may have a lemon. I have 4 BCT15X’s and 2 BCT15’s plus aa couple of 996xt’s, 2 SDS200’s and seveeral others and find them to be great scanners, but there is always that
|
By
Rick Nelson
·
#1562
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
The local NOAA signal is too strong for testing purposes, but I receive the Eastern Shore (162.5), about 30 miles away, 5-9 on the other radios. The 15X does not hear it at all. I won't open the radio
The local NOAA signal is too strong for testing purposes, but I receive the Eastern Shore (162.5), about 30 miles away, 5-9 on the other radios. The 15X does not hear it at all. I won't open the radio
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1561
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
A cheap troubleshoot is to tune to a weak NOAA weather station and use a plastic probe to jiggle the connector inside from BNC connector and the board? Only a thought.
Curt
A cheap troubleshoot is to tune to a weak NOAA weather station and use a plastic probe to jiggle the connector inside from BNC connector and the board? Only a thought.
Curt
|
By
Curt Underwood
·
#1560
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I reprogrammed using ProScan, no attenuation either global or by system. I am avoiding anything that would invalidate the warranty. I propose to return it to the vendor for credit or exchange.
Les,
I reprogrammed using ProScan, no attenuation either global or by system. I am avoiding anything that would invalidate the warranty. I propose to return it to the vendor for credit or exchange.
Les,
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1559
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
By
Terry Copeland
·
#1558
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
Just a thought...
They look like they just have smoke/soot damage. No obvious evidence of Fire or water damage. Have you tried cleaning them up, trying a power up?
good luck either way...
@.02
Just a thought...
They look like they just have smoke/soot damage. No obvious evidence of Fire or water damage. Have you tried cleaning them up, trying a power up?
good luck either way...
@.02
|
By
thomas roth
·
#1557
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
The 15X has both global and system attenuation.
Check to see if that function has been activated in any way.
David
KJ6QKV
The 15X has both global and system attenuation.
Check to see if that function has been activated in any way.
David
KJ6QKV
|
By
David O'Banion
·
#1556
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Les
Crack the top case off, check the solder joint of the centre of the small piece of coax between the pcb and rear case mounted bnc socket. I have over the years found 3 whereby it was not soldered
Les
Crack the top case off, check the solder joint of the centre of the small piece of coax between the pcb and rear case mounted bnc socket. I have over the years found 3 whereby it was not soldered
|
By
GM7BNF
·
#1555
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Les
Crack the top case off, check the solder joint of the centre of the small piece of coax between the pcb and rear case mounted bnc socket. I have over the years found 3 whereby it was not soldered
Les
Crack the top case off, check the solder joint of the centre of the small piece of coax between the pcb and rear case mounted bnc socket. I have over the years found 3 whereby it was not soldered
|
By
GM7BNF
·
#1554
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
"Range" has nothing to do with actual reception, so setting it one way for conventional reception verses a different setting for trunked reception is irrelevant. What "Range" does is determines which
"Range" has nothing to do with actual reception, so setting it one way for conventional reception verses a different setting for trunked reception is irrelevant. What "Range" does is determines which
|
By
Dewey
·
#1553
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I conducted an A-B test with the BCD536, which won (although even that scanner does not pick up the BWI ATC the ICOMs receive). Interestingly, both Unidens had the same limited reception until I
I conducted an A-B test with the BCD536, which won (although even that scanner does not pick up the BWI ATC the ICOMs receive). Interestingly, both Unidens had the same limited reception until I
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1552
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Comparing a whip on a desk to an antenna in the attic is not necessarily a valid test. I have Hardy board siding, which proves to be an excellent RF shield (it's made of concrete, in part).
Comparing a whip on a desk to an antenna in the attic is not necessarily a valid test. I have Hardy board siding, which proves to be an excellent RF shield (it's made of concrete, in part).
|
By
Rick NK7I
·
#1551
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
A good point; didn't consider it, since I don't have airbands programmed into the 536 (using it for local P25 Phase 1 public service). Will program in a conventional airband system and conduct an A-B
A good point; didn't consider it, since I don't have airbands programmed into the 536 (using it for local P25 Phase 1 public service). Will program in a conventional airband system and conduct an A-B
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1550
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Obvious question: How does the 15 compare to the 536?
If there is much of a difference, I
would say there is an issue with the 15.
S-meters, while they at one time were reliable indicators (pun
Obvious question: How does the 15 compare to the 536?
If there is much of a difference, I
would say there is an issue with the 15.
S-meters, while they at one time were reliable indicators (pun
|
By
Joe M.
·
#1549
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Interim Report: I tried different multicoupler ports and even the discone feeding 15X directly; as expected, the same results. A signal must be at least S7 on the ICOMs in order to break minimum
Interim Report: I tried different multicoupler ports and even the discone feeding 15X directly; as expected, the same results. A signal must be at least S7 on the ICOMs in order to break minimum
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1548
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
*Hi,
I have about 5 different units covering several frequency ranges of the Stridesberg Engineering Multicouplers for many years. There are non-powered or 12vdc powered versions. They produce the
*Hi,
I have about 5 different units covering several frequency ranges of the Stridesberg Engineering Multicouplers for many years. There are non-powered or 12vdc powered versions. They produce the
|
By
Don
·
#1547
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I have a Stridsberg multicoupler, it’s amplified. I find my 536 works better with the supplied whip antenna than with the discone on the multicoupler. I think the multicoupler overloads the
I have a Stridsberg multicoupler, it’s amplified. I find my 536 works better with the supplied whip antenna than with the discone on the multicoupler. I think the multicoupler overloads the
|
By
Walter Rymarczyk
·
#1546
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
well, if you have attached the antenna directly to the radio (eliminating the multi coupler and the other radios) amd reception did not improve would that not point to the radio being the likely
well, if you have attached the antenna directly to the radio (eliminating the multi coupler and the other radios) amd reception did not improve would that not point to the radio being the likely
|
By
Rich
·
#1545
·
|