|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I conducted an A-B test with the BCD536, which won (although even that scanner does not pick up the BWI ATC the ICOMs receive). Interestingly, both Unidens had the same limited reception until I
I conducted an A-B test with the BCD536, which won (although even that scanner does not pick up the BWI ATC the ICOMs receive). Interestingly, both Unidens had the same limited reception until I
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1552
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Comparing a whip on a desk to an antenna in the attic is not necessarily a valid test. I have Hardy board siding, which proves to be an excellent RF shield (it's made of concrete, in part).
Comparing a whip on a desk to an antenna in the attic is not necessarily a valid test. I have Hardy board siding, which proves to be an excellent RF shield (it's made of concrete, in part).
|
By
Rick NK7I
·
#1551
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
A good point; didn't consider it, since I don't have airbands programmed into the 536 (using it for local P25 Phase 1 public service). Will program in a conventional airband system and conduct an A-B
A good point; didn't consider it, since I don't have airbands programmed into the 536 (using it for local P25 Phase 1 public service). Will program in a conventional airband system and conduct an A-B
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1550
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Obvious question: How does the 15 compare to the 536?
If there is much of a difference, I
would say there is an issue with the 15.
S-meters, while they at one time were reliable indicators (pun
Obvious question: How does the 15 compare to the 536?
If there is much of a difference, I
would say there is an issue with the 15.
S-meters, while they at one time were reliable indicators (pun
|
By
Joe M.
·
#1549
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Interim Report: I tried different multicoupler ports and even the discone feeding 15X directly; as expected, the same results. A signal must be at least S7 on the ICOMs in order to break minimum
Interim Report: I tried different multicoupler ports and even the discone feeding 15X directly; as expected, the same results. A signal must be at least S7 on the ICOMs in order to break minimum
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1548
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
*Hi,
I have about 5 different units covering several frequency ranges of the Stridesberg Engineering Multicouplers for many years. There are non-powered or 12vdc powered versions. They produce the
*Hi,
I have about 5 different units covering several frequency ranges of the Stridesberg Engineering Multicouplers for many years. There are non-powered or 12vdc powered versions. They produce the
|
By
Don
·
#1547
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
I have a Stridsberg multicoupler, it’s amplified. I find my 536 works better with the supplied whip antenna than with the discone on the multicoupler. I think the multicoupler overloads the
I have a Stridsberg multicoupler, it’s amplified. I find my 536 works better with the supplied whip antenna than with the discone on the multicoupler. I think the multicoupler overloads the
|
By
Walter Rymarczyk
·
#1546
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
well, if you have attached the antenna directly to the radio (eliminating the multi coupler and the other radios) amd reception did not improve would that not point to the radio being the likely
well, if you have attached the antenna directly to the radio (eliminating the multi coupler and the other radios) amd reception did not improve would that not point to the radio being the likely
|
By
Rich
·
#1545
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
No difference trying other output ports on the multicoupler. Unlike a signal splitter, an active multicoupler provides uniform amplification and isolation of all output ports to neutralize signal loss
No difference trying other output ports on the multicoupler. Unlike a signal splitter, an active multicoupler provides uniform amplification and isolation of all output ports to neutralize signal loss
|
By
Leslie Polt
·
#1544
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
Said this 3 times now….but we get no result.
mike
Said this 3 times now….but we get no result.
mike
|
By
GM7BNF
·
#1543
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
You may want to try a LNA to boost the signal level. Each splitter device connected attenuates the signal level.
Matt (via iPhone)
You may want to try a LNA to boost the signal level. Each splitter device connected attenuates the signal level.
Matt (via iPhone)
|
By
Matt Levin
·
#1542
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
First of all, sorry about the fire. I hope everyone in your family, including pets, are OK. I would stay with the 536 or upgrade to the latest technology, the SDS-200.
Mike
First of all, sorry about the fire. I hope everyone in your family, including pets, are OK. I would stay with the 536 or upgrade to the latest technology, the SDS-200.
Mike
|
By
Michael
·
#1541
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
SDS200's
Joel R Kahn
By
Joel Kahn
·
#1540
·
|
|
Re: BCT15X Sensitivity
why not couple the 15X directly to the antenna and see if reception improves?
why not couple the 15X directly to the antenna and see if reception improves?
|
By
Rich
·
#1539
·
|
|
Re: Windows 11 And Sentinel?
Switching to Ubuntu does nothing to solve the problem of running Sentinel.
Switching to Ubuntu does nothing to solve the problem of running Sentinel.
|
By
jim myers
·
#1538
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
Yes, they are insured. 1 & 2 years old.
Tim
Yes, they are insured. 1 & 2 years old.
Tim
|
By
Tim Ferguson
·
#1537
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
One SDS200, one BCD536HP. Both radios have their pros and cons, so with both you get a great system
One SDS200, one BCD536HP. Both radios have their pros and cons, so with both you get a great system
|
By
AC2FV
·
#1536
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
SDS200s for an upgrade, or new 536s.
Joe M.
SDS200s for an upgrade, or new 536s.
Joe M.
|
By
Joe M.
·
#1535
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
No question SDS 200
By
John Harris
·
#1534
·
|
|
Re: Looking for Suggestions
Uh? But new ones? Are they insured?
73,
Gary
Uh? But new ones? Are they insured?
73,
Gary
|
By
Gary - W6GVS
·
#1533
·
|